|
| |
|
| |
 |
Sometimes
we need to see more than what
is before our eyes.
Sometimes 20-20 vision is not
enough…
| |
Will
Schools Never Learn?
|
Towards
2035: The School of Tomorrow
is the most progressive
conference on education
ever planned in Pakistan.
By gathering leaders, visionaries,
and education experts from
both the Region and the
West, the conference aims
to re-examine the jealously
guarded foundations of the
modern school, thereby defining
a clearer vision for schools
over the next 30 years and
beyond.
The core questions that
the conference will address
include:
|
|
 |
|
• Do schools
at present promote real learning?
• What – and how –
should schools be teaching to
prepare students for tomorrow?
• Are exam results the most
reliable measure of achievement?
Are there better ways to assess
students? • What will
be the role of teachers in 2035?
• What role can technology
play in learning? •
What is the role of the community
in effective learning? •
Does the physical structure of
classrooms and schools need to
evolve? • How do tradition
and other vested interests make
it difficult to reform schools?
Indeed, should schools –
as we know them – even exist? |
|
|
| |
| Untapped
Potential |
| |
In
the words of Albert
Einstein: “It
is, in fact, nothing
short of a miracle
that the modern methods
of instruction have
not yet entirely strangled
the holy curiosity
of inquiry; for this
delicate little plant,
aside from stimulation,
stands mainly in need
of freedom…
It is a grave mistake
to think that the
enjoyment of seeing
and searching can
be promoted by means
of coercion and a
sense of duty.”
|

|
|
| Einstein’s
misgivings are mirrored
in the work of educationists
across the globe. The
search is on to find ways
to go with the grain of
the natural curiosity
of the child, thereby
tapping into the deep
reservoirs of human potential.
We need to carefully reassess
the most axiomatic principles
of current educational
orthodoxy, to see where
there needs to be radical
adjustment.
Are examinations really
the best method of assessment?
Or does the examination
structure encourage children
to feel that once the
dreaded test is over,
they can forget all that
they have learned? These
are the sorts of question
we need to ask. But it
would be short-sighted
to believe that the needed
changes can be limited
to just the means of assessment. |
|
| |
| Projecting
the Future |
| |
One
theme that runs through
many educational theories
is the value of project-based
learning. Project
learning allows a
more practical approach
to knowledge: it reflects
reality as it is outside
the classroom. As
a result, what is
learnt stays with
students when they
leave the school environment.
|
 |
|
This
is especially true
when children are
allowed to decide
the direction the
project takes. When
children are encouraged
to ask questions,
and to see where those
questions lead, the
results can be truly
astounding. |
|
| If
the path is cleared
for children in advance,
they are deprived
of the opportunity
to find their own
way. If they are given
space to forge their
own path, the creativity
of their solutions
can be breathtaking.
Sometimes children
might hit dead-ends
and be forced to
find a new way forward,
but because the
search is their
own, and they have
been allowed to
make mistakes for
themselves, they
internalise what
they have learnt.
|
 |
With
methods such
as this, the
role of the
teacher evolves.
Rather than
teachers telling
children what
they need to
know, teachers
guide and assist
the child in
their learning.
This could mean
previous static
curricula, which
were applied
in a blanket
manner, are
replaced with
a more adaptable
learning environment.
This redresses
the implicit
existing assumption
that our talents
and abilities
can be assessed
on a linear
scale. |
|
|
|
| |
| Thinking
Outside the Box |
| |
| The learning
environment itself needs
to be rethought. At present,
we confine learning to schools,
thereby severing it from
the rest of the child’s
life. But this is an artificial
separation.
The latest studies confirm
what parents have always
suspected: children often
learn most through play.
So we should rethink the
notion of a school as
a box wherein learning
takes place, and question
whether schools as we
know them today should
even exist.
|
 |
Should
the physical layout
of schools radically
change? At the moment,
schools tend to have
a uniform, cell-like
structure. Is it any
wonder that many children
come away feeling
that school is a type
of prison? How can
we change this, so
that learning becomes
an exciting process
of discovery, not
a tiresome chore?
In the past, schools
have too often been
unresponsive to change.
|
| Today,
such unresponsiveness
cannot be allowed
to impede full-scale
transformation. |
|
|
| |
| Being Techno-logical |
| |
| Technology
is clearly going to be one
aspect of the struggle to
rejuvenate the school environment.
Yet, we should never see
technology and teaching
as being at cross-purposes.
The teacher should not feel
like the slave of technology;
rather technology should
be the tool of the teacher.
It is easy to forget
that there are technologies
we now take for granted,
that once mystified students
and teachers alike. Even
as innocuous a ‘technology’
as the blackboard required
a teacher training course
when it was introduced
in America. |
But
the changes today
are far more radical
than the blackboard.
The internet and other
digital innovations
signify a shift that
is closer in scope
to the introduction
of Gutenberg’s
printing press in
its potential to reshape
education. If anything,
the impact will be
even greater, as through
interactive media
technologies the entire
structure of learning
can be forged anew.
|
 |
|
Yet,
it would be foolish to
blindly embrace technologies
in the classroom. Rather,
it is imperative we assess
clearly and practically
where there is scope for
improvement. Perhaps we
should keep in mind the
warnings of Plato, in
his masterful Phaedrus,
where he warns:
“By telling them
of many things without
properly teaching them,
they will seem to know
much when for the most
part they know nothing
at all.”
In the age of the internet,
Plato’s warning
is more relevant than
ever. |
|
| |
| Lifetime
Learners |
| |
We are
not just talking here of
changing methods within
the classroom. We are also
talking of preparing children
for a world outside the
classroom that is changing.
|
It
is no longer enough
for workers to learn
one set of skills
and hope that this
will keep them employed
for a lifetime.
There is now a highly
competitive global
workforce that expects
employees to be
able to adapt or
be left behind.
As Alvin Toffler
has warned, “The
illiterate of the
21st century will
not be those who
cannot read and
write, but those
who cannot learn,
unlearn, and relearn.” |
 |
|
|
| |
| Developing
Solutions |
| |
| This is all
particularly true in the so-called
developing nations. In truth,
the poorer countries of the world
are too often reduced to being
shadows of the developed world:
trailing behind, offering second-rate
imitations, festering discontent.
If this process is allowed to
continue, the gap between rich
and poor will widen into a chasm.
This is in nobody’s best
interests. The question arises:
How can we stem this process?
It is a question that has no
one simple answer. However,
the key component in any society’s
development is education. It
follows that if the developing
world can integrate the best
methods and latest technologies
into the classroom, a generation
will be equipped to play a vital
role in the world of tomorrow.
This is not fantasy. This is
not delusion. This is stark
pragmatism. The question should
not be whether such a revolution
in education should take place.
Rather the question should be:
What form will this revolution
take? And: How quickly can we
make it happen?
|
| |
| Power and
Knowledge |
| |
Yet change
never comes without resistance.
As with change comes a shift
in power. In this case,
the change would allow children,
all children, to become
empowered through knowledge.
Wherever power shifts hands,
wherever a populace is given
the ability to ask questions,
vested interests resist
with all the power that
the out-dated system has
invested in them.
|
 |
Yet
the simple fact remains:
schools cannot stay
static, for the world
outside is changing.
More and more businesses
depend on the latest
technologies. They
require employees
who are able to learn,
able to adapt and
able to keep ahead
of the game. The school
of tomorrow will need
to meet these demands.
|
|
We
must remember that schools
should serve two masters:
the student and the society,
with the parent acting
as gatekeeper between
the two. But in our changing
world, society and students
have converging interests.
We are not living in
a Victorian society where
mindless factory workers
are needed for mass production.
In such a society, it
was perhaps inevitable
that education should
follow the philosophy
of Dickens’ Gradgrind,
who famously said, “Now,
what I want is, Facts…
Facts alone are wanted
in life.” But tomorrow’s
world will have a different
master, with different
wants and needs. |
|
| |
| Conference
Call to Action |
| |
| Towards
2035: The School of Tomorrow
aims to address these fascinating
and fundamental questions. By
gathering leaders, visionaries
and experts from across the world,
we hope to generate the most intensive
and extensive debate on the future
of education that Asia has ever
seen.
We are also striving to make
the conference embody the principles
under discussion. To this end,
it will incorporate focussed
seminars, interactive exhibits,
web casting, videoconferencing
and simulated model classrooms.
But we hope that Towards 2035
will do more than just spur
a debate.
We hope it will lead to action.
As Asia’s largest private
school network, poised on the
brink of an unprecedented expansion,
we are in a unique position
to implement the ideas the conference
generates.
So it is that we set out our
clear hope that this conference
will not only help forge a vision
for tomorrow’s schools,
but will start the process of
making that vision a reality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|